CSAC Ethnographics Gallery
CSAC FeatureMainResearchResourcesTeachingOrganisationsOther

Calculating Kin: Analyzing and Understanding Cultural Codes

Michael D. Fischer


Modelling Kinship Terminologies

We are going to take a relatively simple approach to illustrate how to analyze a terminology.

If we look at the terms used in English Kinship Terminology (EKT),

mother, father, son, daughter, brother, sister
uncle, aunt, nephew, niece
cousin (differently elabourated in different English speaking cultures)
grandfather, grandmother, grandson, granddaughter
granduncle, grandaunt, grandniece, grandnephew (in many dialects)
plus
great-grandmother, great-great-grandmother etc
and
great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather etc

there are also the affinal terms:

wife, husband, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, mother-in-law and father-in-law as well as uncle and aunt.

there are two basic classificatory distinctions being made, sex and generation. Most kinship terminologies make use of these in some part of the terminology, and not in others. EKT is no different.

Most terms are marked for sex, that is, EKT has mostly pairs that are differented by sex, eg mother , father , son , daughter , brother , sister , uncle , aunt . Indeed the only term which is not marked is cousin . There are terms like parent , child and sibling in English which can be used as kin terms that do not mark sex, but in all these cases there are sex-marked alternatives.

For a terminology to be useful (and reduce the information necessary to learn the system), there must be a systematic way to assign kinship names to individuals, e.g. match up genealogical positions to kinship terms. Kinship terms are distinct from genealology, but must provide a means to address the assignment problem.

This

father - a male of the first ascending generation
mother a female of the first ascending generation
son - a male of the first descending generation
daughter - a female of the first ascending generation
brother - a male of the same generation
sister - a female of the same generation

These are not yet definitive - uncle is also of the first ascending generation, niece of the first descending generation. These will only work as a means of assignment if we start from a primative set of kin terms; a set that is sufficient to define all the other terms.

In the case of EKT, we can start with the undifferentiated term for first descending generation, child, and the attribute male or female.

Using these we can proceed:

daughter --> female child
son --> male child
father --> male reciprocal of child
mother --> female reciprocal of child
sibling --> someone who shares parents
brother --> male sibling
sister --> female sibling
grandparent --> parent of parent
grandmother --> female grandparent
grandfather --> male grandparent
grandchild --> reciprocal of grandparent
grandson --> male grandchild
granddaughter --> female grandchild
uncle --> male sibling of parent
aunt --> female sibling of parent
cousin --> child of parent's sibling
niece --> female child of sibling
nephew --> male child of sibling

Note that sex is only marked for the end of the genealogical path, not for the positions intermediate. Many terminologies mark sex for some intermediate positions, but EKT does not.

Some of the importance of defining terms in terms of other terms is that a) if possible this indicates structure that we can expect to find in the culture of native thinkers, and b) it reduces the amount of actual information required for this system to work in a real society. For example, in the examples above, we need only supply genealogical data about children, males and females. All the remaining relationships can be calculated based on this data. We could have chosen parent as a basic category, and identical results would occur. A more detailed analysis would indeed permit us to find that parent is more likely the basic category, but in our simpler approach here there is no way to decide which is more basic.

There are other relationships, the affinal relationships, e,g.

spouse, wife, husband, uncle, aunt, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, father-in-law, mother-in-law . In our approach we must specify data for spouses, but in conjunction with our earlier analysis, the remaining terms can all be defined in terms of spouse , child , male and female . You should construct these as an exercise.

Return to Kinship Systems



Welcome to the Ethnographics Gallery

Current News, Events and Activities for CSAC and Kent Anthropology

Archiving a Cameroonian Photographic Studio

Visual Anthropology at Kent

Ethnobiology of Europe website

Seeing the ring: A nineteenth century photograph album

Other News about Kent Anthropology


UKC Anthropology
Studying Anthropology at Kent

Kent Student Notes

Kent Anthropologists

UKC Anthropology Society



CSAC's Resources for Anthropologists

A collection of resources by CSAC and others that may be of use to anthropologists

Summary list of CSAC online publications
CSAC Studies in Anthropology ISSN 1363 1098
CSAC Publications
BICA Online
Anthropology Intermedia Library
more...

Bibliography and Reading
Online Reading for Anthropologists

Experience Rich Anthropology

Anthropological Index Online

CSAC Anthropology Bibliography (Makhzan)

UK Anthropology Theses


Organisations
The Royal Anthropological Institute

RAI Anthropological Index Online

RAI Calendar of Events

Association of Social Anthropologists

ASA Monographs CD Ordering Info

Society for Anthropological Sciences

SASci Wikid


CSAC thanks the following organisations for their support:
Centre for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics

Economic and Social Research Council

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Medical Research Council

Higher Education Funding Council for England


About the Ethnographics Gallery

The Ethnographics Gallery is a project of the Centre for Social Anthropology and Computing. It is the direct descendent of the oldest online resource for Anthropology, dating to 1986. While we are giving the Gallery a face lift, please remember there are 20 year old pages within these halls.

We have no funding stream for this site, and so little time to maintain older material so it well may have a bit of a museum effect. Newer material will be appropriately wizzy.


What is the Ethnographics Gallery?

The Ethnographics Gallery is a publication of the Centre for Social Anthropology and Computing. This site contains reports on CSAC research, Teaching materials, and Resources that can be used for planning and executing research, including bibliographic materials, databases of ethnographic material, fieldnotes, descriptors, and software for working with ethnographic data. Suggestions always welcome, but we have no funding stream for this website. It contains materials created since 1986, and many of them are rather unfashionable by today's standards. We do, however, want everything to work! mail suggestions to csac@kent.ac.uk

Return to top

History

Our first internet service was begun in November, 1986, followed by our first web site in May, 1993, one of the first 400 web sites. The Ethnographics Gallery was founded in Feburary 1994. Our mission at that time was to provide a forum for anthropologists on the internet, and we helped to launch a number of organisations into cyberspace. Today, we are mostly concerned with novel forms of online publishing, disseminating our research, promoting learning resources, and disseminating information about using computers in anthropological research.

Return to top

Updated Sun Jan 22 20:00:14 GMT+00:00 2006
RSS Feed - Return to CSAC's Ethnographics Gallery

CSAC Ethnographics Gallery

Return to CSAC's Ethnographics Gallery